How we ensure that every accessibility assessment we deliver is rigorous, consistent, and genuinely useful for building committees navigating OGUC compliance.
A quality commitment isn't a marketing phrase — it's a set of specific, verifiable standards that govern how we conduct every assessment, write every report, and interact with every committee. This page explains what those standards are and how they show up in our day-to-day work.
We work in a field where the quality of our output has direct consequences for real people: residents who depend on accessible routes, committees that need to make sound financial decisions, and building administrators who carry legal responsibility. That context shapes everything about how we approach our work.
Our quality standards are not aspirational statements. They are operational commitments that define what every Nolxedi assessment looks like — regardless of building size, location, or complexity.
Every assessment we conduct is built on these four foundational principles.
We use calibrated measuring instruments for every physical dimension. Ramp slopes, corridor widths, door clearances, and fixture heights are recorded to the precision required by OGUC — not estimated or approximated.
Every finding in our reports cites the specific OGUC article it relates to. We do not make general statements about compliance — we link each observation to the exact regulatory text that governs it.
Our reports explain not just what we found, but how we measured it, what standard we applied, and why a particular finding was classified as critical, moderate, or minor. The reasoning is always visible.
We write reports for committees, not for other consultants. Every recommendation includes a cost range, a suggested implementation sequence, and plain-language guidance — so the people who need to act on it actually can.
Every finding is accompanied by photographic documentation taken during the site visit. Photos are labeled, captioned, and cross-referenced to the relevant section of the report, creating an auditable record of the assessment.
We apply the same structured inspection protocol to every building we assess. This consistency means our reports are comparable across assessments and that no element is overlooked due to variation in how individual inspectors approach their work.
Our assessment reports follow a structured format designed to serve multiple audiences: committee members who need to understand what was found, administrators who need to plan and budget, and assembly participants who need to vote on proposed expenditures.
A concise overview of the building's current accessibility status, the total number of gaps identified, and the distribution of findings across severity levels. This section is written to be understood without reading the full report.
Each assessed element — ramp, corridor, elevator, signage installation, bathroom, parking space — receives its own section with measurements taken, applicable OGUC article, observed gap (if any), severity classification, and photographic documentation.
All interventions are listed in priority order, with each item showing: a plain-language description of the work required, the OGUC article that mandates it, an estimated cost range based on typical contractor rates in Santiago, and a suggested implementation phase.
Interventions are grouped into suggested phases — typically Phase 1 (critical, immediate), Phase 2 (moderate, within 12 months), and Phase 3 (minor, within 24 months) — with estimated total cost per phase to support budget planning.
The full text of every OGUC article cited in the report is reproduced in an appendix, so committees have the legal basis for every recommendation in a single document without needing to consult external sources.
Our assessments are conducted by professionals with backgrounds in architecture, civil engineering, or occupational therapy — disciplines that provide the technical foundation needed to evaluate building elements against accessibility standards.
Every assessor who conducts site visits for Nolxedi is trained in our inspection protocol and familiar with the current OGUC accessibility requirements. Before any report is finalized, it is reviewed by a senior team member to verify consistency and accuracy.
We maintain an internal quality review process where a second professional reviews every report before it is delivered to the client. This peer review step catches inconsistencies, verifies regulatory citations, and ensures the recommended interventions are technically sound.